This online generator creates your own custom unique WordPress Theme. Without any need for HTML, JS, PHP, or CSS knowledge.

Change the colors, settings, layout, preview live, click “save” and download your unique WordPress theme zip-file. Extract, upload, set, and you are done! If you have any questions or need additions visit the forum.

Based on WordPress 2.1 to 2.3 with Yahoo! UI (grids, tabs & fonts) to support all A-Grade browsers and valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional. Theme supports Widgets & Tags. Themes examples: read more…

I haven’t tried this service yet but I did have a interest in scrapbooking in a former life but I remain passionate about the power of story with visuals. Using RSS of course, Scrapbloggers can share their creations with one another.
Scrapbooks can be made public or private. I’ve taken a look at several of the public scrapbooks and I must say that this service is exciting, fun and very promising. Scrapblog allows you to import photos from Flickr and embed your Scrapblog pages in MySpaces pages or your personal blog.

Scrapblog allows you to enhance your scrapblog with rich media so that you can tell your stories in real-time and with engaging visuals. Scrapbook hobbyist from all walks of like would do well to check this service out. Assuming there isn’t a to big of a digital divide between traditional scrapbook creators and social publishing aspects of Scapblog using RSS and blog publishing, there should a very bright future in store for Scrapblog.

Visit  Scrapblog today

Richard Farmbrough, a 45-year-old technology project manager living in England, is said to be the person with the most Wikipedia entries. Wikipedia is often accused of containing innacurate listings and was even made fun of by Stephen Colbert who coined the term Wikiality. In an interview with Smith Magazine, Farmbrough says he thinks Wikipedia can be a better source of information than a library in some situations.

Do you think Wikipedia is a better source of information than going to the library?

Farmbrough: In some ways. The question only makes sense if you state who is looking for what, and which library is involved. For example, if you have a university library available to you, you will get more and better information on most subjects, except, perhaps, popular culture. If you only have a small-town library, you can probably find out as much or more from Wikipedia on many subjects, but it will be “chunked” differently — it might not be easy to learn calculus, certainly not Linux or Anglo-Saxon from Wikipedia (although, there are sister wikis which address these types of needs). The Wikipedia community has a strong belief in maintaining the goal of building an encyclopedia, rather than a how-to resource, a dictionary (though there is also Wiktionary) or “an indiscriminate collection of information.”

Some of Wikipedia’s seven million articles are debated or contested as people often have different takes on what the facts are. However, printed media – books, magazines and journal – may also carry the bias of the author(s). Most of the Wikipedia entries do try to source the facts in the article by linking directly to each source in the References section.

Some who disagreed enough with Wikipedia have even launched their own wiki encyclopedias, like Conservapedia. Stephen Colbert’s clever wikiality term now has over 400,000 results on Google. There’s even a Wikiality encylcopedia that’s dedicated to truthiness.